Chapter 9: Competitive Analysis

LQDTY is designed to be a next-generation Layer 1 blockchain, solving fundamental challenges existing blockchain networks face, such as high transaction costs, limited scalability, security vulnerabilities, and regulatory compliance issues. This chapter provides an in-depth competitive analysis, comparing LQDTY to leading blockchain
platforms like Ethereum, Solana, and Sui, highlighting its unique strengths and value propositions.


9.1 Comparison with Existing Layer 1 Platforms


LQDTY competes directly with Ethereum, Solana, and Sui, which are widely recognized for their smart contract capabilities and decentralized applications (dApps). Below is a comparison of LQDTY with these major blockchain networks across critical performance metrics.


Feature Comparison
Feature Comparison: LQDTY vs Ethereum vs Solana vs Sui
Feature LQDTY Ethereum Solana Sui
Transaction Fees Gas-Free for Users (Paid by Deployers) High & Unpredictable Low but Volatile Low
Consensus Mechanism Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Proof-of-History (PoH) + PoS Delegated Proof-of-Stake (dPoS)
Smart Contract Language Rust-Based (Scalable & Secure) Solidity Rust & C Move
Throughput (TPS) High (>10,000 TPS) 15-30 TPS 65,000 TPS 10,000+ TPS
Finality Time Near-Instant 6-12 seconds ~2-3 seconds 0.5-1 seconds
Security Model Biometric Key Shard & ZKP Compliance Traditional Private Keys Private Key-based Move VM Security Features
Interoperability Cross-Chain Liquidity w/ Major DEXs Limited (Bridges Required) Some (Wormhole Bridge) Cross-Chain Functionality
Regulatory Compliance Built-in AML, KYC & Accreditation in (ZKPs) No Native Compliance No Native Compliance No Native Compliance
Developer Incentives Gas-Sponsored Model & Grants Grants & Gas Fee Grants & Low Fees Grants & Fast Execution


Key Takeaways from the Competitive Analysis


  1. Gas-Free User Transaction Model (Paid by Sponsor): LQDTY removes user transaction fees, shifting costs to smart contract deployers, a considerable advantage over Ethereum and Solana.
  2. Regulatory Compliance: Unlike most competitors, LQDTY natively supports AML/KYC verification and investor accreditation using Zero-Knowledge Proofs
    (ZKPs).
  3. Security & Privacy: LQDTY integrates biometric key shard verification for secure transactions, a feature absent in Ethereum, Solana, and Sui.
  4. Scalability: With high transaction throughput (10,000+ TPS) and near-instant finality, LQDTY competes with Solana's performance while ensuring better security.
  5. Developer-Friendly Infrastructure: LQDTY supports Rust-based smart contracts, tiered fee structures, and grants, making it cost-efficient for developers.